The time scales in the ocean, in the land and in the ice mean that we are not going to see a reversal of global warming for centuries. So our choices are not about stopping global warming or continuing it, it's really about moderating its influence. We could go hell-to-leather toward a business-as-usual scenario which would result in a planet that was unrecognizable. Or we can try really hard to mitigate against that and keep the changes at a rate at which we can adapt to them. The role of scientists is to say we have choices. If we choose not to do anything about carbon-dioxide emissions, this is what will likely happen: a much warmer world with with very large and severe changes in rainfall patterns and continuing and accelerating sea level rise. Or if we do many things we can moderate that so in the end, by making smart decisions, we can adapt to the changes that are already outgoing.
Show less «